AI Development Services in Los Angeles

Where to Start?

When you start thinking about building an AI application, it helps to know what the process is actually like. A lot of people imagine it as mysterious or overly complicated, but at its core it is still software development. You have to set clear goals, gather the right data, choose the right models, and make sure the whole thing runs reliably once it is deployed.

The interesting part is that while the engineering steps look familiar — APIs, databases, infrastructure — the results feel different. You are building systems that can respond to users, generate answers, or even create new content. That is why businesses and individuals are so eager to use it.

To put this in context, let’s look at how AI got here. The field has been around for decades. Researchers in the 1950s first started talking about “artificial intelligence” and tried to design programs that could think or solve problems. In the following decades, there were a few successes in games and language, but progress was slower than people hoped, and funding and interest faded a couple of times.

There were important breakthrough years though. In 1997, IBM’s Deep Blue beat Garry Kasparov in chess. In 2011, IBM Watson won Jeopardy! and showed what natural language processing could do on live television. Around that same period, voice assistants like Siri and Alexa showed up in consumer devices.

The big shift came in the 2010s with deep learning. Better hardware and large datasets made it possible to train neural networks that could recognize images and process language at a much higher level of accuracy. That opened the door to applications in computer vision, speech recognition, and eventually large language models.

When OpenAI launched ChatGPT in late 2022, that was the turning point for many people. It made large language models accessible in a simple chat interface. Within months, millions of people were using it for everything from drafting emails to writing code. Businesses quickly saw the potential and started exploring how to integrate it into their workflows.

Large language models, or LLMs, are trained on massive amounts of text. They predict the next word in a sequence, but because of the size and training methods, the results feel like natural conversation. Some experts debate whether they are “reasoning” or just mimicking patterns, but the practical results are what matter. People use them to draft documents, summarize information, analyze data, and even generate creative work.

By 2025, AI has gone far beyond text generation. Companies are building multimodal systems that handle text, images, and even video. Hospitals are using AI to assist with medical imaging. Studios in Los Angeles use it for content production. Legal firms use it for research. Adoption has been faster than almost any other technology in recent history.

If you are in Los Angeles today, you see this everywhere. Tech startups are pitching AI-driven apps, entertainment companies are experimenting with AI-generated content, and healthcare startups are using it to assist clinicians. The demand for development services is high because companies need experts who can help them move from the idea stage to working products.

So if you are planning to build something, what you can expect is a combination of traditional software development work and new challenges specific to AI. You will need to think carefully about data, accuracy, and how to integrate AI into user experiences in a way that is reliable. It is not just about adding a chatbot — it is about building systems that deliver real value.

Not every AI application is built the same way

A lot of people hear the word “AI” and assume it all works like ChatGPT, but there are different categories of development, each with its own strengths and limitations. If you are planning to build something, it is important to understand which approach makes sense for your use case.

One common approach is what you could call AI wrappers. This is when a company takes an existing large language model — like GPT-4, Claude, or Gemini — and builds an application layer around it. For example, a legal tech startup might use the API of a model to summarize contracts and then wrap it with a user interface, a database to store client information, and some business logic. Wrappers are usually faster to build because you are relying on someone else’s model. The trade-off is that you have less control over the behavior, and you are dependent on the provider’s pricing and uptime.

Then there is the use of LLMs as decision support systems. This is when you connect an AI model to internal knowledge bases or workflows so it can assist with specific tasks. For instance, a healthcare startup might connect an LLM to medical guidelines and electronic records so doctors can ask questions and get relevant answers. The AI does not make the final decision, but it helps professionals by filtering, ranking, or summarizing information. This approach adds real value because it combines the model’s capabilities with domain-specific expertise.

A step further is building agents. Agents are systems where an AI model is given goals, access to tools, and the ability to take actions. Instead of just answering a question, an agent might decide it needs to look up data in a database, run a calculation, and then generate a report. For example, a sales agent could automatically gather leads, send outreach emails, and update a CRM. Agents require more careful design because you have to give them controlled access to external systems, define guardrails, and ensure they do not create problems if they take the wrong step.

Another category is generative AI. This is where the AI is not just analyzing data but creating new content: text, images, audio, or video. Los Angeles has seen a lot of activity in this area because of the entertainment and media industries. Studios are using AI to generate storyboards, designers use it to create marketing visuals, and musicians are experimenting with AI-generated tracks. Generative systems can be built on top of existing models like Stable Diffusion, MidJourney, or OpenAI’s image and audio models, or they can be fine-tuned for specific company needs.

Each of these approaches has different technical requirements. Wrappers rely heavily on API integration and front-end design. Decision support systems need strong data pipelines and retrieval methods so the model has access to accurate information. Agents require orchestration frameworks and monitoring. Generative AI often needs specialized GPUs and storage for media outputs.

From a business perspective, it also changes the cost profile. Wrappers can be built quickly but might have ongoing usage fees tied to API calls. Decision support and RAG systems need investment in data preparation. Agents and generative systems are usually more expensive upfront because of infrastructure and training needs, but they can deliver greater differentiation.

If you look at startups in Los Angeles right now, you will see all of these approaches. Some are launching quick wrapper products to test markets. Others are building enterprise-grade decision support tools, especially in law, healthcare, and finance. Media companies are betting heavily on generative content. The important point is that “AI development” is not one thing — it is a set of approaches, and picking the wrong one can waste both time and money.

At around this point in the conversation, people often ask, “So what should I build first?” The answer depends on your goal. If you want to launch quickly and test demand, a wrapper might make sense. If you are in a regulated industry, you probably need a decision support tool connected to trusted data. If you are looking for automation, an agent can be powerful, but it requires careful design. And if you are in entertainment, design, or marketing, generative AI may be where you see the fastest return.

The other thing to remember is that these categories are not mutually exclusive. A single product can combine them. For example, a healthcare app might be a wrapper around an LLM, use retrieval methods for decision support, and include generative AI for creating patient education materials. The lines are often blurred, but understanding the categories helps you plan correctly.

And since we are about 500 words in, here is a lighter moment: building a wrapper app around ChatGPT is a little like ordering takeout. It is fast, it works, and you do not need to cook yourself. Building an agent system is more like cooking a full dinner with multiple courses — more effort, more dishes to wash, but a lot more control over what ends up on the table.

Going deeper into each category, you will notice some trends. Wrappers are saturating the market. Thousands of startups are building simple chat interfaces around GPT models. The challenge here is differentiation: if everyone is using the same base model, the only difference is your UI and business model. That is why many of these companies struggle to retain users.

Decision support is where enterprise adoption is strongest. Large companies want AI tools that can improve employee productivity without compromising accuracy or compliance. Connecting models to internal data with retrieval techniques is the main way this is happening. It is also where most consulting firms see the highest demand because enterprises need expertise in both data engineering and AI integration.

Agents are still experimental, but they are gaining traction. Frameworks like LangChain and AutoGPT showed the potential, but businesses are now looking for more reliable implementations. Agents that can carry out structured tasks within guardrails are starting to appear in finance, real estate, and customer support.

Generative AI is moving quickly beyond novelty. In Los Angeles, agencies are using it for marketing campaigns, filmmakers are testing it for pre-visualization, and fashion brands are producing AI-driven lookbooks. Some projects succeed, some fail, but the momentum is strong.

If you are a company in Los Angeles considering AI development, you should expect service providers to ask you a lot of questions at the beginning:

• Do you need speed to market, or do you need depth of integration?

• What is your tolerance for ongoing costs?

• How much data do you already have?

• Do you need differentiation, or are you testing a simple concept?

The right answers point to the right category of AI development. The wrong answers lead to wasted effort.

Some Stats about AI

AI is no longer a technology that sits in research labs waiting to prove itself. It is being used in day-to-day business, both in startups and in large enterprises. The difference is mostly in speed and scale. Startups move quickly and experiment with new features. Enterprises move more slowly but invest heavily in infrastructure and compliance. Both groups see AI as a way to get ahead.

Let’s start with startups. In Los Angeles and across the U.S., many early-stage companies are building products around AI wrappers. These companies use existing large language models and add a layer that makes them useful for a niche market. A good example is legal tech. A number of startups offer tools that summarize contracts, highlight risky clauses, or generate first drafts of agreements. They are not building their own models; they are building workflows that lawyers actually use.

Healthcare is another common startup area. Companies are using AI to transcribe doctor-patient conversations, generate notes for electronic medical records, and suggest next steps in treatment. Scribe and DeepScribe are two well-known players in this space, both of which claim they can save doctors hours each week. This is exactly the kind of problem startups like to solve — a clear pain point with measurable value.

Education startups are also heavy users of AI. Tools like Duolingo have integrated generative AI to make learning more interactive. Smaller companies are building tutoring platforms where students can ask questions and get explanations in real time. In Los Angeles, several edtech startups are experimenting with AI-driven personalized lesson plans for K-12 students.

On the enterprise side, the story looks different. Enterprises are less likely to launch a public-facing chatbot. Instead, they are building decision-support systems for employees. For example, Morgan Stanley built an AI assistant for its financial advisors. The system pulls from the firm’s research database and lets advisors query it in plain English. This is not about replacing humans — it is about giving professionals faster access to the right information.

Another big enterprise case is customer support. Companies like Zoom and HubSpot have integrated AI into their products to summarize meetings, suggest follow-up tasks, and help customer support agents respond faster. These features reduce costs and improve customer satisfaction, which is why adoption is so strong.

Healthcare enterprises are going further than startups. Hospitals and insurers are testing AI for diagnostic imaging, fraud detection, and claims processing. According to a 2024 report by McKinsey, AI could generate up to $100 billion in value annually across the healthcare sector by improving productivity and reducing errors.

Entertainment, especially in Los Angeles, is a special case. Studios are using generative AI to draft scripts, design virtual characters, and pre-visualize scenes before they are shot. Netflix has experimented with AI to recommend not just what you should watch next, but which thumbnails to show you based on your profile. Disney has invested in AI for animation workflows. In an industry where production costs are high, any efficiency gain matters.

The numbers tell the story. PwC estimates that AI could contribute $15.7 trillion to the global economy by 2030. Gartner predicts that by 2026, over 80 percent of enterprises will have used generative AI APIs or deployed generative AI-enabled applications. And a recent Accenture survey showed that 98 percent of executives believe AI will be essential to their strategy in the next three years.

For startups, the draw is speed. A founder can launch an MVP with an AI wrapper in weeks, test the market, and pivot quickly. For enterprises, the draw is scale. They can integrate AI into existing systems and apply it to thousands of employees or millions of customers.

If you look specifically at Los Angeles, the mix is unique because of the industries concentrated here. Startups focus on creative AI, entertainment, and consumer products. Enterprises focus on healthcare, media, and finance. The demand for AI development services comes from both directions.

Around here, you often hear two types of conversations. Startup founders ask, “How fast can we build this, and will users like it?” Enterprise executives ask, “How do we make this reliable, safe, and compliant with regulations?” Both questions matter, but they lead to very different development strategies.

And since we are about 500 words in, here is the humor drop: enterprises talk about “AI adoption roadmaps,” “change management,” and “compliance frameworks.” Startups talk about “getting something live before Friday.” Sometimes it feels like enterprises are writing novels about AI, while startups are speed-dating it.

One last point here is about risk. Startups can afford to fail. If an experiment does not work, they move on. Enterprises cannot. A bank or hospital cannot deploy an unreliable AI system. That is why enterprises are so focused on techniques like retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), monitoring, and auditing. We will cover that in the next section, but it is worth mentioning here because it explains why AI development services in Los Angeles often look very different depending on whether the client is a startup or a Fortune 500 company.

To summarize this chapter: startups are using AI to launch new products fast, enterprises are integrating AI into existing operations, and both are seeing real results. The difference lies in approach, speed, and risk tolerance.

Making AI use your application data

One of the first things people learn when they start working with AI is that large models like ChatGPT are powerful, but they are not always accurate. These models are trained on public data, which means they know a lot about general topics but very little about your company’s specific needs. If you ask a model a question about corporate policies, financial records, or proprietary research, it will not have that information unless you give it access.

This is where the distinction between public data and custom data becomes critical. Public data is what the model already knows from training. Custom data is what you supply so it can give relevant answers. Without custom data, you get generic responses. With custom data, you can get answers that are specific to your business.

The problem of hallucinations comes up when the model tries to be helpful but gives you an answer that sounds confident and is completely wrong. For example, if you ask an LLM about your company’s internal refund policy and it has not seen that data, it might make up something that sounds plausible. That is not just inconvenient; it can be dangerous if employees or customers act on false information.

The main way the industry has addressed this is with retrieval-augmented generation, or RAG. In a RAG system, the model is not expected to memorize everything. Instead, when a user asks a question, the system retrieves relevant documents from a database and provides them to the model as context. The model then generates an answer based on both its training and the retrieved data.

For example, let’s say you are a university that wants to use AI to answer student questions about admissions. Without RAG, the model might guess at deadlines or requirements. With RAG, the system pulls the exact information from the admissions database or website and passes it to the model. The result is accurate and consistent.

There are other techniques beyond RAG. Fine-tuning is one option, where you retrain a model on your own data so it adapts to your domain. This works well for specialized tasks like legal or medical analysis, but it can be expensive and requires more technical expertise. Prompt engineering is another approach, where you design the input carefully to guide the model toward correct answers. And of course, human-in-the-loop systems can be used to review outputs before they go live, which is common in regulated industries.

In Los Angeles, companies are starting to combine these techniques. A healthcare startup might fine-tune a smaller model on medical notes, use RAG to pull in guidelines, and then apply human review for final approval. An entertainment company might use RAG for accessing a script library while also fine-tuning a generative model for character dialogue.

It is worth mentioning that the more sensitive the data, the more important privacy and security become. Using custom data means you need to store it securely, control who can access it, and decide whether it can be sent to third-party model providers. Many enterprises now prefer self-hosted models or use providers with strong compliance certifications like HIPAA or SOC 2.

From a development services perspective, one of the biggest values we provide to clients is helping them structure their data for AI. Most companies have data spread across PDFs, spreadsheets, and legacy systems. Making it usable for AI means cleaning it, tagging it, and storing it in a way that can be retrieved quickly. This step is often harder than building the AI itself.

And here is the humor drop: hallucinations are what happen when an AI really, really wants to be your helpful coworker, but it did not hear the question properly. It is like when someone at a dinner party insists on answering a trivia question even though they clearly do not know the answer. Confident delivery, zero accuracy.

To reduce hallucinations, companies also use vector databases like Pinecone, Weaviate, or Milvus. These systems store text in a mathematical format that makes it easy to search for similar content. So when you ask a question, the system retrieves the most relevant chunks of data, even if your wording does not match exactly. This is a core part of building RAG systems.

Public data still has value. For general knowledge, language fluency, and reasoning ability, public training is unmatched. But for your business, you need a layer of custom data. That combination — public data for reasoning and custom data for accuracy — is what makes AI applications useful in real-world settings.

If you are in Los Angeles, this is exactly where many development services firms, including ours, focus their expertise. Clients come in thinking they want “AI like ChatGPT.” What they really need is AI that knows their own documents, policies, and workflows. Bridging that gap is the work of structuring custom data, preventing hallucinations, and building reliable retrieval systems.

Some Examples of our Work

Facilitate is an AI development consultancy based in Los Angeles. Our focus is helping companies turn AI from an idea into a working product. A lot of teams come to us with questions like “Can we use AI for this?” or “How do we make this reliable?” and our role is to guide them through the options, build the right system, and make sure it scales.

We have worked with universities, startups, and enterprises across different industries. Each project looks different because AI is not one-size-fits-all. What stays the same is the process: we work with clients to understand their goals, review their data, pick the right approach, and then build the system end-to-end.

One example is the knowledge base RAG system we built for the University of California, Irvine. The challenge was that students and faculty needed quick access to a large library of internal documents. The existing search system was clunky and often returned irrelevant results. We built a retrieval-augmented generation solution that connects the university’s data sources to an AI interface. Now users can ask questions in plain English and get accurate answers with references back to the original documents. The result is less time wasted digging through files and more trust in the system.

Another example is the fitness trainer application. The idea was to create a voice-activated personal trainer that can chat with users, understand their workout history, and suggest personalized next steps. We built the system so users can have a natural back-and-forth with the trainer, while the AI has access to their private exercise data. The trainer can recommend routines, track progress, and even adjust intensity based on past performance. What makes this unique is not just the conversational interface but the ability to adapt to each individual’s goals.

These examples highlight a bigger point: building an AI application is not just about plugging into a model. It is about connecting that model to the right data, creating a user experience that people actually want, and making sure privacy and reliability are built in. That is where a consultancy adds value.

In Los Angeles, demand is high because industries here are so diverse. Entertainment companies ask us about generative AI for pre-production and marketing. Healthcare organizations want decision-support systems that help doctors or insurers. Startups often come with bold ideas for AI agents that automate tasks. Each of these requires a different development approach, but the foundation is always the same: clear goals, structured data, and careful engineering.

The clients we work with usually care about three things. First, speed — they want something live quickly. Second, accuracy — they want the system to give reliable results. Third, security — they want their data protected. Our job is to balance those goals and explain the trade-offs along the way.

Here’s the humor drop: some clients come in saying, “We just need an AI chatbot.” After a few meetings, it turns out they also need data cleaning, workflow automation, security audits, and a brand-new front end. In other words, they did not want just an AI chatbot — they wanted a small startup built for them.

Another part of our story is that we were working on AI before it was fashionable. Back when ChatGPT did not exist and AI was not in every headline, we were building systems that used machine learning for practical problems. That early experience gives us perspective. We know what works, what does not, and how to avoid chasing hype for the sake of it.

Working in Los Angeles adds another layer. This city has both creative and technical industries, and we get to work at the intersection. It is not unusual for us to have one meeting with a university research department in the morning and a call with an entertainment studio in the afternoon. That variety keeps projects interesting and pushes us to stay on top of new trends.

The core message here is simple: Facilitate helps organizations take advantage of AI in a way that fits their specific needs. We are not just integrating models — we are designing systems that actually deliver results.

We built AI before Everyone Else

One thing that sets us apart at Facilitate is that we were working with AI before it was in the headlines every day. Back then, it was not called “AI” in the mainstream. It was just machine learning, natural language processing, or computer vision. The projects were more specialized, but they gave us experience with the same foundations that power today’s systems.

A good example is the work we did on entity extraction from EDGAR, the SEC’s massive public database of corporate filings. These filings contain valuable information for investors and analysts, but they are long and complex. Our job was to build systems that could scan thousands of documents and automatically identify key entities: company names, executives, financial figures, and relationships between them.

At the time, this meant designing custom models that could handle messy financial text. The challenge was not just identifying words but understanding context — for example, knowing when “Apple” meant the company versus the fruit. That project taught us how to work with large, unstructured datasets and turn them into structured insights. Today, that same skill translates into building retrieval systems for modern language models.

We also worked on support vector machines (SVMs) for classification tasks. Some of this work was done in sensitive areas like defense projects, so details cannot be shared, but the core techniques were the same. We built classifiers that could take in large datasets and sort them into meaningful categories. SVMs were one of the strongest tools at the time for supervised learning, and working with them gave us hands-on experience with model training, feature engineering, and evaluation.

Another area where we were early is computer vision for healthcare. We trained custom models to detect patient positions in hospital settings. The idea was to use video or imaging data to monitor patients for safety and care. This was before deep learning became dominant, so models had to be designed carefully with limited data. The work showed us how important accuracy and robustness are in medical applications. Mistakes in healthcare AI are not minor bugs — they can impact patient safety. That mindset still guides us when we build health-related AI today.

Looking back, these projects might feel modest compared to today’s large language models and generative systems, but they gave us a foundation that newer firms often lack. We learned how to clean and structure data, how to evaluate models rigorously, and how to deliver results that clients could trust.

And here’s the humor drop: back then, telling people you worked on AI usually got you blank stares or polite nods. Today, telling people you work on AI gets you long conversations about ChatGPT, robot takeovers, or whether their kid’s homework is secretly written by a model. Same field, very different level of interest.

The main point is that Facilitate has been doing this work long before it became trendy. That gives us not just technical expertise but perspective. We know which ideas are genuinely useful and which ones are hype. We have seen technologies come and go, and we have adapted to the shifts. That is why clients trust us — we are not just following trends, we are applying years of hands-on experience.

FREE Consultation - contact us now

If your team is exploring AI and you want to turn ideas into working products, Facilitate can help. We are based in Los Angeles and bring years of hands-on experience in building reliable AI systems for startups, enterprises, and universities. We offer a free one-hour consultation to discuss your goals, review your data, and outline practical next steps. Get in touch with us today and let’s start building your AI solution.